I’m not arguing there’s a problem. I’m arguing that you useless lying fucks have no solutions either. You just want to funnel more money to people who are already wealthy.
"To defeat the GOP, we must copy their policies! Wait, that can't be right..." It's the Democrat version of right wing libertarianism. The Dems are going to hand us 20 years of Trumpian Christian Nationalism with this id10cy
At some point, it becomes willful. They either know what they're doing and are doing it on purpose, or they're delusional and just keep doing the same nonsense over and over. Both of which are terrible. It's probably a mix of both
Except, progressive policies, as shown by EVERY poll, resulted in Trump winning again. When will you people take the L? Progs pushed open borders, gender nonsense, and crazy student loan forgiveness. The result was Trump winning.
And yet you people think the country wants... more of that?
Every poll? Are the polls in the room with us now? Because progressive voters told Biden and Harris to end support for Israel, and they didn't, and so they lost the progressive vote. They lost the Islamic vote because of it, which cost them Michigan. Harris courted Republicans, not progressives. She dumped Medicare for All as a policy, something that is wildly popular. She started backing off of trans rights. She went further and further right to try to get Republican votes. The Dem stance on Gaza cost them the election, and they knew it was going to, which is why she chased the GOP. The actual polls show broad support for progressive policies. The ballot initiatives that pass across the country typically favor better wages and abortion rights. And there is no "gender nonsense." There's just a bunch of bigoted MAGAts taking rights away from trans people. That's only a "problem" because it's a nice scary boogeyman they can use to trick idiots into voting for the interests of the rich. There is a big disconnect between the people elected and what the typical voter wants. And more Christian Nationalist buIIshit is not what a majority of people want. Please look at real data, and not the trash right wing think tanks pull together by misconstruing polls or asking loaded questions
For the record - Kamala Harris' position on Gaza was that there should be an immediate ceasefire, and that Palestinians should eventually have self-determination in the territories. Her opponent's position was that Netanyahu needed to go harder and "finish the job" - as a prelude to Palestinian-free resort development, we heard later.
You can tell how out of touch someone is based on how much they think "Gaza" influenced the election. Hint: 22 year old gender studies majors are not a huge voting bloc.
You seem to support men playing women's sports, also. You do know that 85%+ of the country does not, right? How exactly do you think you are gonna win?
Hilarious.
Please look at the top 20 issues voters cared about this election. Gaza is not on there bud. Get out of your echo chamber.
God, this is sad to watch. Trying to demean and diminish the people who are outraged over a genocide is a pathetic attempt to validate your fallacious attempt at an argument. Plus, like I already said, losing the Muslim vote in Michigan cost them that state which is a key swing state.
Which non-Nazi politicians campaigned on trans women in sports? I already told you that Harris abandoned the trans community. The only people making trans people an issue is the MAGAts. It's entirely a distraction to keep their dups angry and voting for politicians who fuck over those same voters. Like the complete morons who believed Trump would and could lower egg prices, so they elected him and egg prices haven't improved and everything is about to get even more expensive for working people thanks to his tariffs. The head of the NCAA said that there are 10 trans athletes out of over 500,000 in the association. TEN. The only reason anyone is bent out of shape about trans athletes is because bigot mouthpieces have made it their entire personality. MAGAts think about gay sex and trans people's genitals more than actually gay and trans people.
The top 20 issues? You mean like in the Gallup poll conducted in Sep 2024 that had both the "situation in middle east between Israelis and Palestinians" (which 93% of respondents said was at least somewhat important) and "transgender rights" (which 63% said was at least somewhat important) in the top 20? Maybe get your head out of your ass and go actually look at data before saying stupid shit.
You are trying to say the **15th** most important topic cost them the election.
Are you joking?
Your arrogance and righteousness is nauseating. I bet you support student loan forgiveness too? And when plumbers in PA don't want higher taxes to pay for some kids gender studies degree, instead of asking why they don't, you call them racist.
You said, "Please look at the top 20 issues voters cared about this election. Gaza is not on there bud."
Then moved your goalposts to "the 15th topic isn't important." Thanks for conceding via ignorance.
You clearly don't know how student loan interest works. So let me educate you before you move the goal posts again. Normal loans have a fixed term and charge interest only on the remaining principle. Like a mortgage. They create an amortization table that calculates the interest over the term of the loan and if you just pay it as is, you'll pay a fixed amount of interest over the life of the loan. Student loans aren't like that. They compound on their interest. So if I borrow $1000, and $10 of interest is added, and I pay $5, the next amount of interest calculated will be on $1005, not just the original $1000 like every other normal loan in existence, apart from credit cards, and student loans aren't rotating balances like credit cards. So people can borrow $30,000 to go to college, pay back $60,000 and still owe $40,000 because of the compounding interest. Loan forgiveness would wipe out that $40,000 because the loan has long since been paid. The taxpayers won't be paying anything. That's why it's called loan forgiveness, not loan payoff. It's fixing a problem that shouldn't be allowed to exist in the first place. But the loan companies pay propaganda mills to pump out lies, like what you're claiming, because those companies want to be able to keep charging people money long after the debt would have been paid on any normal loan.
It is hard to elect sane people (which the Dems aren't, but at least they're not all openly Nazi trash like the GOP) when idiots like yourself uncritically swallow the propaganda the rich pump out.
That's what makes me so frustrated about this. These books are supposed to be unprescriptive so non-political audiences can enjoy them. That's fine, but pretending this is a rigorously theorized political strategy is outlandish.
I agree with how frustrating the Abundance discourse is.
A very well written and thorough article. I especially liked the breakdown of how and why the federal rural broadband program BEAD got gummed and stifled by ISPs. I feel like the best arguments against Abundance that will persuade normies, as in people who aren't constantly plugged into politics like political junkies, pundits, and analysts like ourselves, Klein, etc. , to persuade the normies and grillers and the base, is to specifically target and analyze certain industries that Klein and Thompson argue need deregulation but don't address the massive role that Oligarchy plays into government dysfunction in said topic, and then expose the oligarchic influence at hand and show that the Abundance duo is lying to them about it. Broad general arguments about philosophy don't feel as concrete in comparison.
Basically, "Klein/Thompson/Abundance claim that X or Y or Z needs deregulation but they never point the finger at tbe Oligarchy. Here's specifically how Oligarchy screwed over X, Y, and Z and how Abundance people know this and are purposely lying to you about the real reasons why government doesn't work. The problem isn't environmentalists and advocate groups but oligarchs, corporations, and moneyed interests. The Abundance is the establishment's false flag to fool you and keep you down."
The arguments brought forth by Klein and Thompson about zoning and housing are particularly grating because the examples they give, like Houston building more houses than say NYC or LA or so on, don't actually investigate the reality and facts on the ground. Namely, ask a Houston resident or an expert in Houston housing about the quality of the housing built or the actual reasons why it's built (which had to do with tech companies, especially major semiconductor companies like Nvidia, AMD, Intel, etc. moving into places like Houston, Austin, Fort Worth, Dallas, etc.), and the reality that they convey is dismal and critical. Funny how that never gets explored in Abundance.
Probably because it would debunk part of it's premise in regards to zoning.
And again and again, Klein and Thompson try to nuance monger to obfuscate and confuse, especially in the critical idea of how moneyed interests play a very critical role in why zoning and construction and housing and healthcare so much more is so expensive and ineffective, which the Abundance duo very pointedly don't really acknowledge or grapple with or at the very least, dance around and obfuscate around. Instead Klein instead blames environmentalists for the reason why regulations strangle development in housing and public transit and so on. How curious that centrist liberal types like Klein and so on, that their critiques are always aimed at those beside or below them but NEVER above.
Like the idea that Klein brought up about how NIMBYs and real estate developers are two types of moneyed interests with competing interests so "moneyed interests" can't be the overarching problem of why things can't be built in America and of restrictive zoning policies
In regards to conversations of affordable housing, NIMBYs and real estate developers aren't really in conflict with each other as the problem is that developers never really build affordable housing because where's the money in that? Instead, they build luxury apartment buildings with whatever legally mandated affordable apartments baked into the center while the majority of the luxury apartments are bought and sold to use as mostly investment vehicles, not actual places of living. Why bother renting these apartments when you can sell them for the equivalent price of 100 months worth of rent all at once? This is a common problem in urban development and why urbanists are critical of it. Just because NIMBYs and real estate develops seemingly clash when it comes to money-power is not as what it seems on the surface. They ultimately have the same money-power interest which does not include truly affordable housing. Instead it's always public-private partnerships that give public money to subsidize private development with little to no strings or oversight.
There's also the Faircloth Amendment, lobbied by real estate developers, NIMBYs, and so many other moneyed interests which restricts the construction of public housing units that can be built and operated. To quote the National Coalition For The Homeless from their page about it which explains thr Faircloth Amendment,
"In 1998, through the Faircloth Amendment, the U.S. Government created an artificial barrier by limiting the number of public housing units that federal authorities could build and has resulted in many people being left without a home. This amendment prevents any net increase in public housing stock from the number of units as of October 1, 1999. Simply put, the Faircloth Amendment sets a cap on the number of units any public housing authority (PHA) could own and operate, effectively halting new construction of public housing. This prevents policymakers from using a vital tool, building more permanent affordable housing, to address our nation’s growing housing and homelessness crisis."
"In the two decades since the Faircloth Amendment passed, rent costs have skyrocketed while average incomes have not. The median inflation-adjusted rent has increased 13.0 percent since 2001, while the median inflation-adjusted renter’s income has only increased 0.5 percent during that same period. This obstacle in creating more affordable housing that the amendment created, is happening while there is a $70 billion backlog in funding for maintenance and repairs to existing public housing stock."
Blue states have more homeless people because rich liberals don't let houses be built. Meanwhile, Texas has an abundance agenda and regular people can actually afford houses. The whole reason they wrote the book is because everywhere liberals govern, poor people suffer.
“Abundance” is just “trickle-down” with a fresh paint job. I can’t believe anyone’s still dumb enough to fall for it. The theory that what slops out of the trough while wealthy people gorge themselves will somehow be enough for the rest of us never worked and never will.
Absolutely love this. I’ve honestly become thoroughly disgusted with the Democratic party after Chuck Schumer’s appalling cowardice in the face of the regime. When are these fucking people going to realize the Clinton era is over? Nobody who matters actually gives a shit about “empowering entrepreneurship” anymore, because the only people who find that narrative compelling are already Republicans (and yes, I’m exaggerating, because the point is that the actual voting base for bullshit neoliberalism has shrunk to irrelevance).
These cowards and losers need to go. They stand for nothing, they’ve offered nothing, and they never miss an opportunity to spout lofty verbiage before predictably and reliably failing to do the right thing. The fuck with all of them.
You make a lot of good points, I still think the book is interesting and outlines some key problems, but also agree that the theater or the tour itself is somewhat annoying.
I'm sure he is decent person and all but in the many years I have followed Mr. Klein's work I have never found him to have original ideas. He strikes me as an morally opportunistic middle of the road commentator. He says whatever mass media palpable semi liberal position gets him attention and money.
Can we stop giving him press ? He uses too many resources to say too little. There is an actual abundance of people who have mericratic value.
I suspect Starlink and internet companies aspiring to create a satellite option were the biggest players in slowing this process. As rural broadband is Starlink's business model, of course they're going to attack public alternatives!
The OP upfront says that this piece isn't about reviewing or critiquing the book but the book tour interviews that the Abundance author duo have done and the arguments that Klein and Thompson presents in those interviews, which is what JoeWrote is critiquing and fact checking here. He even specifically critiques Klein's claims about why rural broadband has failed and how Klein is deliberately Lying g and misrepresenting the facts to push his repackaged neoliberal agenda.
No problem. I find it very entertaining how you are like a cartoon character who keeps stepping on that same rake over and over again. Of course, you do it while also repeating "true socialism has not been tried yet" each time you get whacked in the face.
But not to worry, the "progressive" movement's newly-minted alliance with super-regressive religio-fascist Islamist movement is a genius move that is bound to work out great for you. Just ask the Iranian labor and socialists from 1979. LOL.
I don’t really think there is a “true” socialism or any ideology for that matter. And I’m pretty clear socialism has been implemented past and present, so I don’t think you’re actually reading what I write.
You nailed it with that strikethrough - “Abundance” is just “Trickle-down” with a fresh coat of paint.
Thanks! Strikethrough is a vastly underrated formatting tool, in my opinion, especially for satire.
You know you are out of touch when "removing NIMBY barriers to housing" equals Ronald Reagan.
Let me know how that works out for you.
Let me know how the snarky, judgmental attitude has played for the progs.
I’ll lose the snarky judgmental attitude as soon as "removing NIMBY barriers to housing" is more than bullshit hot air.
Tell that to the millions of people paying more in rent due to low house construction in blue states. Again, you are so, so out of touch.
I’m not arguing there’s a problem. I’m arguing that you useless lying fucks have no solutions either. You just want to funnel more money to people who are already wealthy.
It is a blue state thing. Blue states don’t do trickle down
"To defeat the GOP, we must copy their policies! Wait, that can't be right..." It's the Democrat version of right wing libertarianism. The Dems are going to hand us 20 years of Trumpian Christian Nationalism with this id10cy
I honestly can't believe they think this will work again.
At some point, it becomes willful. They either know what they're doing and are doing it on purpose, or they're delusional and just keep doing the same nonsense over and over. Both of which are terrible. It's probably a mix of both
Well identity politics, open borders, and blue states with crazy expensive housing certainly isn’t doing the trick.
Except, progressive policies, as shown by EVERY poll, resulted in Trump winning again. When will you people take the L? Progs pushed open borders, gender nonsense, and crazy student loan forgiveness. The result was Trump winning.
And yet you people think the country wants... more of that?
Jesus Christ.
Every poll? Are the polls in the room with us now? Because progressive voters told Biden and Harris to end support for Israel, and they didn't, and so they lost the progressive vote. They lost the Islamic vote because of it, which cost them Michigan. Harris courted Republicans, not progressives. She dumped Medicare for All as a policy, something that is wildly popular. She started backing off of trans rights. She went further and further right to try to get Republican votes. The Dem stance on Gaza cost them the election, and they knew it was going to, which is why she chased the GOP. The actual polls show broad support for progressive policies. The ballot initiatives that pass across the country typically favor better wages and abortion rights. And there is no "gender nonsense." There's just a bunch of bigoted MAGAts taking rights away from trans people. That's only a "problem" because it's a nice scary boogeyman they can use to trick idiots into voting for the interests of the rich. There is a big disconnect between the people elected and what the typical voter wants. And more Christian Nationalist buIIshit is not what a majority of people want. Please look at real data, and not the trash right wing think tanks pull together by misconstruing polls or asking loaded questions
For the record - Kamala Harris' position on Gaza was that there should be an immediate ceasefire, and that Palestinians should eventually have self-determination in the territories. Her opponent's position was that Netanyahu needed to go harder and "finish the job" - as a prelude to Palestinian-free resort development, we heard later.
You can tell how out of touch someone is based on how much they think "Gaza" influenced the election. Hint: 22 year old gender studies majors are not a huge voting bloc.
You seem to support men playing women's sports, also. You do know that 85%+ of the country does not, right? How exactly do you think you are gonna win?
Hilarious.
Please look at the top 20 issues voters cared about this election. Gaza is not on there bud. Get out of your echo chamber.
God, this is sad to watch. Trying to demean and diminish the people who are outraged over a genocide is a pathetic attempt to validate your fallacious attempt at an argument. Plus, like I already said, losing the Muslim vote in Michigan cost them that state which is a key swing state.
Which non-Nazi politicians campaigned on trans women in sports? I already told you that Harris abandoned the trans community. The only people making trans people an issue is the MAGAts. It's entirely a distraction to keep their dups angry and voting for politicians who fuck over those same voters. Like the complete morons who believed Trump would and could lower egg prices, so they elected him and egg prices haven't improved and everything is about to get even more expensive for working people thanks to his tariffs. The head of the NCAA said that there are 10 trans athletes out of over 500,000 in the association. TEN. The only reason anyone is bent out of shape about trans athletes is because bigot mouthpieces have made it their entire personality. MAGAts think about gay sex and trans people's genitals more than actually gay and trans people.
The top 20 issues? You mean like in the Gallup poll conducted in Sep 2024 that had both the "situation in middle east between Israelis and Palestinians" (which 93% of respondents said was at least somewhat important) and "transgender rights" (which 63% said was at least somewhat important) in the top 20? Maybe get your head out of your ass and go actually look at data before saying stupid shit.
Here's that poll in case you'd like to start: https://news.gallup.com/poll/651719/economy-important-issue-2024-presidential-vote.aspx
You are trying to say the **15th** most important topic cost them the election.
Are you joking?
Your arrogance and righteousness is nauseating. I bet you support student loan forgiveness too? And when plumbers in PA don't want higher taxes to pay for some kids gender studies degree, instead of asking why they don't, you call them racist.
Keep this up and the dems will never win.
You said, "Please look at the top 20 issues voters cared about this election. Gaza is not on there bud."
Then moved your goalposts to "the 15th topic isn't important." Thanks for conceding via ignorance.
You clearly don't know how student loan interest works. So let me educate you before you move the goal posts again. Normal loans have a fixed term and charge interest only on the remaining principle. Like a mortgage. They create an amortization table that calculates the interest over the term of the loan and if you just pay it as is, you'll pay a fixed amount of interest over the life of the loan. Student loans aren't like that. They compound on their interest. So if I borrow $1000, and $10 of interest is added, and I pay $5, the next amount of interest calculated will be on $1005, not just the original $1000 like every other normal loan in existence, apart from credit cards, and student loans aren't rotating balances like credit cards. So people can borrow $30,000 to go to college, pay back $60,000 and still owe $40,000 because of the compounding interest. Loan forgiveness would wipe out that $40,000 because the loan has long since been paid. The taxpayers won't be paying anything. That's why it's called loan forgiveness, not loan payoff. It's fixing a problem that shouldn't be allowed to exist in the first place. But the loan companies pay propaganda mills to pump out lies, like what you're claiming, because those companies want to be able to keep charging people money long after the debt would have been paid on any normal loan.
It is hard to elect sane people (which the Dems aren't, but at least they're not all openly Nazi trash like the GOP) when idiots like yourself uncritically swallow the propaganda the rich pump out.
Clinton did it, with great success.
Blows my mind that people take Ezra and Derek seriously. These guys scream passive income.
That's what makes me so frustrated about this. These books are supposed to be unprescriptive so non-political audiences can enjoy them. That's fine, but pretending this is a rigorously theorized political strategy is outlandish.
I agree with how frustrating the Abundance discourse is.
A very well written and thorough article. I especially liked the breakdown of how and why the federal rural broadband program BEAD got gummed and stifled by ISPs. I feel like the best arguments against Abundance that will persuade normies, as in people who aren't constantly plugged into politics like political junkies, pundits, and analysts like ourselves, Klein, etc. , to persuade the normies and grillers and the base, is to specifically target and analyze certain industries that Klein and Thompson argue need deregulation but don't address the massive role that Oligarchy plays into government dysfunction in said topic, and then expose the oligarchic influence at hand and show that the Abundance duo is lying to them about it. Broad general arguments about philosophy don't feel as concrete in comparison.
Basically, "Klein/Thompson/Abundance claim that X or Y or Z needs deregulation but they never point the finger at tbe Oligarchy. Here's specifically how Oligarchy screwed over X, Y, and Z and how Abundance people know this and are purposely lying to you about the real reasons why government doesn't work. The problem isn't environmentalists and advocate groups but oligarchs, corporations, and moneyed interests. The Abundance is the establishment's false flag to fool you and keep you down."
The arguments brought forth by Klein and Thompson about zoning and housing are particularly grating because the examples they give, like Houston building more houses than say NYC or LA or so on, don't actually investigate the reality and facts on the ground. Namely, ask a Houston resident or an expert in Houston housing about the quality of the housing built or the actual reasons why it's built (which had to do with tech companies, especially major semiconductor companies like Nvidia, AMD, Intel, etc. moving into places like Houston, Austin, Fort Worth, Dallas, etc.), and the reality that they convey is dismal and critical. Funny how that never gets explored in Abundance.
Probably because it would debunk part of it's premise in regards to zoning.
And again and again, Klein and Thompson try to nuance monger to obfuscate and confuse, especially in the critical idea of how moneyed interests play a very critical role in why zoning and construction and housing and healthcare so much more is so expensive and ineffective, which the Abundance duo very pointedly don't really acknowledge or grapple with or at the very least, dance around and obfuscate around. Instead Klein instead blames environmentalists for the reason why regulations strangle development in housing and public transit and so on. How curious that centrist liberal types like Klein and so on, that their critiques are always aimed at those beside or below them but NEVER above.
Like the idea that Klein brought up about how NIMBYs and real estate developers are two types of moneyed interests with competing interests so "moneyed interests" can't be the overarching problem of why things can't be built in America and of restrictive zoning policies
In regards to conversations of affordable housing, NIMBYs and real estate developers aren't really in conflict with each other as the problem is that developers never really build affordable housing because where's the money in that? Instead, they build luxury apartment buildings with whatever legally mandated affordable apartments baked into the center while the majority of the luxury apartments are bought and sold to use as mostly investment vehicles, not actual places of living. Why bother renting these apartments when you can sell them for the equivalent price of 100 months worth of rent all at once? This is a common problem in urban development and why urbanists are critical of it. Just because NIMBYs and real estate develops seemingly clash when it comes to money-power is not as what it seems on the surface. They ultimately have the same money-power interest which does not include truly affordable housing. Instead it's always public-private partnerships that give public money to subsidize private development with little to no strings or oversight.
There's also the Faircloth Amendment, lobbied by real estate developers, NIMBYs, and so many other moneyed interests which restricts the construction of public housing units that can be built and operated. To quote the National Coalition For The Homeless from their page about it which explains thr Faircloth Amendment,
"In 1998, through the Faircloth Amendment, the U.S. Government created an artificial barrier by limiting the number of public housing units that federal authorities could build and has resulted in many people being left without a home. This amendment prevents any net increase in public housing stock from the number of units as of October 1, 1999. Simply put, the Faircloth Amendment sets a cap on the number of units any public housing authority (PHA) could own and operate, effectively halting new construction of public housing. This prevents policymakers from using a vital tool, building more permanent affordable housing, to address our nation’s growing housing and homelessness crisis."
"In the two decades since the Faircloth Amendment passed, rent costs have skyrocketed while average incomes have not. The median inflation-adjusted rent has increased 13.0 percent since 2001, while the median inflation-adjusted renter’s income has only increased 0.5 percent during that same period. This obstacle in creating more affordable housing that the amendment created, is happening while there is a $70 billion backlog in funding for maintenance and repairs to existing public housing stock."
It’s simply self-promotion.
What a frustrating co-optation of the concept of "abundance". "Abundance" for the few and crumbs for the rest is not abundance.
Blue states have more homeless people because rich liberals don't let houses be built. Meanwhile, Texas has an abundance agenda and regular people can actually afford houses. The whole reason they wrote the book is because everywhere liberals govern, poor people suffer.
"But as the political winds changed faster than a Republican’s anti-choice stance once his mistress gets pregnant..."
Love it!
lol, I was pretty proud of that!
How about faster than every progressive ideal get abandoned in favor of supporting Hamas. That's pretty fast too.
“Abundance” is just “trickle-down” with a fresh paint job. I can’t believe anyone’s still dumb enough to fall for it. The theory that what slops out of the trough while wealthy people gorge themselves will somehow be enough for the rest of us never worked and never will.
I honestly couldn't believe how absurd their argument was. It's Reaganism 101.
Absolutely love this. I’ve honestly become thoroughly disgusted with the Democratic party after Chuck Schumer’s appalling cowardice in the face of the regime. When are these fucking people going to realize the Clinton era is over? Nobody who matters actually gives a shit about “empowering entrepreneurship” anymore, because the only people who find that narrative compelling are already Republicans (and yes, I’m exaggerating, because the point is that the actual voting base for bullshit neoliberalism has shrunk to irrelevance).
These cowards and losers need to go. They stand for nothing, they’ve offered nothing, and they never miss an opportunity to spout lofty verbiage before predictably and reliably failing to do the right thing. The fuck with all of them.
I couldn't agree more 🫡
You make a lot of good points, I still think the book is interesting and outlines some key problems, but also agree that the theater or the tour itself is somewhat annoying.
I don't inherently disagree. I'm sure bureaucracy can slow good governance. But as you said, the book tour is something else entirely.
Renaming the product/drug to hide how weak it has become. Learned that from The Wire.
A great educational resource!
I'm sure he is decent person and all but in the many years I have followed Mr. Klein's work I have never found him to have original ideas. He strikes me as an morally opportunistic middle of the road commentator. He says whatever mass media palpable semi liberal position gets him attention and money.
Can we stop giving him press ? He uses too many resources to say too little. There is an actual abundance of people who have mericratic value.
Thank you for this. Abundance instantly struck me as rebranded trickle down for the rebranded center-right republicans (aka centrist democrats).
You're welcome!
They are just capitalists.
I have government funded internet, its called Starlink. It's not that great and comes with a high moral cost, but it's the ONLY option in my area.
No landlines.
No traditional satellite.
No cell coverage.
I suspect Starlink and internet companies aspiring to create a satellite option were the biggest players in slowing this process. As rural broadband is Starlink's business model, of course they're going to attack public alternatives!
I know this isn't the right lesson to take from your essay but I bet it must be a great life writing airport bestsellers
Probably fantastic! It's all vibes, top to bottom.
You should check out the If Books Could Kill podcast if you haven't already. I suspect you'd appreciate it.
"want to be clear — this is not a book review. I haven’t read Abundance, and I don’t plan to."
...proceeds to do a book review and acts like he read it
The OP upfront says that this piece isn't about reviewing or critiquing the book but the book tour interviews that the Abundance author duo have done and the arguments that Klein and Thompson presents in those interviews, which is what JoeWrote is critiquing and fact checking here. He even specifically critiques Klein's claims about why rural broadband has failed and how Klein is deliberately Lying g and misrepresenting the facts to push his repackaged neoliberal agenda.
Media literacy is your friend.
Hilarious. To be fair, if any one knows failed political campaigns and ideas it's socialists like you.
Thanks! Always appreciate your support. ❤️
No problem. I find it very entertaining how you are like a cartoon character who keeps stepping on that same rake over and over again. Of course, you do it while also repeating "true socialism has not been tried yet" each time you get whacked in the face.
But not to worry, the "progressive" movement's newly-minted alliance with super-regressive religio-fascist Islamist movement is a genius move that is bound to work out great for you. Just ask the Iranian labor and socialists from 1979. LOL.
I don’t really think there is a “true” socialism or any ideology for that matter. And I’m pretty clear socialism has been implemented past and present, so I don’t think you’re actually reading what I write.