17 Comments
User's avatar
Frank Spesia's avatar

Really good point about how active social security users have the highest support for the program. This reminds me of organizers for tenants’ unions. They don’t want the government to nudge the “free market” into building more housing - they want renters’ rights. Good problem solvers focus on the needs of users. It would be pretty cool if our political parties started acting like problem solvers.

Joe Wrote's avatar

It's such a simple and effective political strategy: What are your needs? Okay, let me help you with those. One cool thing Mexican President Claudia Sheinbaum did was establish the beaches as public property. Not because it's life saving, but because its something voters care about.

Frank Spesia's avatar

Who do you think is doing this best here in the US? Lord knows it’s not from Dem leadership. Who is a bright spot domestically?

Mary Johnson's avatar

Wonderful, clear article! But what do we do about these people? How do we stop them?

Joe Wrote's avatar

Thanks, Mary! As for the immediate future, I highly suggest finding an organization that will protest attacks on SS and other programs. Given how popular the program is, I do believe protest and other disruptions could make Trump back down (even if just a little) on his plan to cut it.

Susan Feiner's avatar

Also, an excellent source for a comprehensive overview of SS is a small free booklet A Young Persons Guide to Social Security.

Joe Wrote's avatar

I'll check it out, thanks for sharing!

Susan Feiner's avatar

Joe, your argument is mostly correct. But the Tax Rate for SS is 12.4%, half (6.2%) from worker/half from boss.

Joe Wrote's avatar

Sorry if that wasn't clear!

Eli Redman's avatar

I find it hard to believe that only 37% of Americans would be below the poverty line. As someone who is living this if what I have already worked for, paid into the system, and already paid taxes on is removed I face being homeless. And yes, I am working at the same rate that they pay 18 year old's with none of the experience that I have.

Joe Wrote's avatar

What's crazy is that the poverty rate is less than $15,060. So while 37% would be below that line, far more would be slightly above it. Which is still impoverished but not technically counted by the US.

Eli Redman's avatar

Yes. It's totally crazy. Really more like completely fucked up.

Brucker's avatar

Nothing excites right-wingers more than sabotaging a successful government program. They've nearly destroyed the Postal Service.

Joe Wrote's avatar

It's their only operating feature.

Eugine Nier's avatar

Sorry, but Social Security is in fact broken, whether you want to admit it or not.

Eugine Nier's avatar

It's basically an unsustainable Ponzi scheme.