Discussion about this post

User's avatar
BenMedia's avatar

100% agree. Identity Politics has always been a way for the Democrats to garner support from marginalized communities without actually doing anything for them and without having to challenge private power.

And I think what exposed Identity Politics as a farce was how many of the chief purveyors of it reacted to Bernie Sanders, who was running a class-centered campaign that would've benefited everyone. You cited a few examples and here's a few more.

-Angela Davis came out and said that Bernie Sanders was weak on the issue of racism

-Ta-Nehisi Coates came out and said that Bernie Sanders was weak on the issue of reparations

-Gloria Steinem came out and said that the only reason young women were going to Bernie rallies was to meet boys

-Kimberly Crenshaw came out and said that the real revolution wasn't coming from Bernie Sanders, but from corporations like Amazon marketing themselves to BLM and Pride (yes, she actually said).

Identity Politics is a centrist farce to pretend to be socially progressive without threatening private power.

Expand full comment
Shaggy Snodgrass's avatar

The centrists love projecting "identity politics" upon the left because that's what they want us to do: engage in endless, fruitless squabbles over who gets to run the "anthill" instead of expanding the anthill's territory.

Identity politics are by their very nature unsolvable; so if we are bound into them we will never get anything else done.

That's part of their attraction to centrists, at least on the rhetorical level; but we should recognize the futility of pursuing those for the past 50 years, + how it's put us so damn far behind.

Expand full comment
45 more comments...

No posts